~hackernoon | Bookmarks (1884)

The first year of business is a critical period that provides valuable insights into the future trajectory of your company. By analyzing early successes and failures, understanding customer feedback, and identifying operational strengths and weaknesses, you can make informed decisions that shape long-term growth and stability. This period helps in refining your business strategy, adapting to market demands, and building a resilient foundation for...

The reality of Agile implementation is often far from the glossy picture painted by consultants and textbooks.

Decentralized AI goes beyond merely fortifying defenses. It encourages a proactive and intelligent approach to security, where systems can autonomously detect, adapt, and recover from threats.

The hype for Gen AI has settled as organizations have begun to lay the groundwork for seamless adoption. But there are decisions that must be made, dilemmas to be solved, and questions to be answered. We list the top 10 Enterprise Gen AI dilemma facing the C-suite leaders.

You need to hold a vote and elect a representative of your group, for example, the president of the Galaxy. What do you do?

"Humphrey's Harmonious Hiccups" is a charming tale about a hedgehog named Humphrey who can't stop hiccuping. With tools like Gemini and Imagen, we can create personalized, engaging narratives that captivate young minds and foster a love for reading. With the help of AI, this dream is becoming a reality.

Big name corporations are embracing and have hinted at a stamp of approval of AI and blockchain. From tech giants like Amazon and Google to financial institutions like Visa and Goldman Sachs, these companies are living in the tomorrow and investing heavily in such innovations to stay ahead.

Artificial Consciousness Technology (ACT) has taken a bold step forward by introducing digital humans with autonomous thoughts and personalities.

According to a recent CNBC report, Morgan Stanley has decided to allow its financial advisors to offer spot Bitcoin ETFs to eligible clients.

Data breaches can cost millions in lost patents, penalties, law suits, databases, and also the loss of potential profits. IBM estimates that an average of $4.88 million is lost for every data breach. The Ponemon Institute found that organisations and corporations that are utilising AI LLMs save up to $1.2 million per breach.

Developers often fall into the trap of procrastination. There are actionable strategies you can implement and it is actually not that hard. Break down big projects into smaller, more manageable tasks. Prioritize your Most Important Tasks each day. Leverage the Power of Accountability.

Many Crypto PR agencies exist to shill tokens, whereas authentic projects in the space are not so loud. Learn how projects with real utility can leverage PR and how newbies who are not degens can spot shilling influencers.

Plaintiff ( Elon Musk) requests a jury trial for all issues that are eligible to be tried by a jury, as per Rule 38(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

Elon Musk seeks a comprehensive range of relief in his lawsuit against Defendants, including compensatory, consequential, and statutory damages, restitution, and disgorgement of ill-gotten gains. He requests a constructive trust on assets traceable to his contributions, an accounting of gains derived from these contributions, and a judicial ruling on the validity of OpenAI’s license to Microsoft. Musk also seeks specific performance of contractual promises,...

The lawsuit alleges that these entities helped exploit Musk’s contributions, which were solicited for charitable purposes, for commercial gain. The OpenAI For-Profit Entities are accused of helping in the concealment and misuse of technology, enriching themselves at Musk's expense. Musk seeks damages exceeding $75,000, restitution, and an injunction against further wrongful conduct, along with punitive damages for oppression and fraud.

He alleges that the defendants made materially false and misleading claims about OpenAI's AI/AGI technology, advertising it as open-source and non-commercial while secretly using contributions for proprietary and commercial purposes. Musk relied on these misleading statements, leading to substantial harm. He seeks damages exceeding $75,000, prejudgment interest, and a permanent injunction to prevent further false advertising by the defendants.

He alleges that the defendants solicited contributions under false pretenses, presenting OpenAI as a non-profit dedicated to public benefit while secretly pursuing commercial gain. This deceptive conduct, which misused donations intended for open-source AI research, has harmed Musk's interests and reputation. Musk seeks damages exceeding $75,000, prejudgment interest, and a permanent injunction to prevent further unfair practices by the defendants.

Musk alleges that the defendants misled the public by falsely representing OpenAI as a non-profit dedicated to open-source AI/AGI research while secretly pursuing commercial interests. These deceptive practices harmed Musk's reputation and business interests, including the recruitment of top talent. Musk seeks damages, including restitution and disgorgement of profits, and an injunction against further misleading advertising. He also seeks treble damages and attorneys' fees...

Musk contends that his significant financial contributions were made with the understanding that OpenAI would remain a non-profit devoted to public benefit. The defendants are accused of concealing their intentions and transforming OpenAI into a commercial enterprise. Musk seeks restitution, including a constructive trust and restitutionary disgorgement of profits and assets gained through wrongful conduct, with damages exceeding $75,000.

This claim asserts that the defendants unfairly interfered with Musk's ability to benefit from their agreement to develop AI/AGI technology for public use. Musk fulfilled his obligations by investing over $44 million and recruiting talent. However, Altman and OpenAI allegedly acted in bad faith by failing to disclose key information, closing off technology for profit, and engaging in self-dealing. Musk seeks damages for these...

Researchers used GIS layers including road networks, ZIP Code Tabulation Areas (ZCTAs) (as a surrogate for ZIP code areas), and census blocks with the 2010 demographic data for the entire U.S. The process includes three major steps: (1) obtaining a preliminary estimate of the centroid-to-centroid drive times between every two ZIP Code areas, (2) using Google Maps to derive drive times for randomly-sampled OD...

P (polinomyal time) vs NP (non-polynomial time) is a question that tackles the underlying complexity roots of specific problem spaces. For example, a P problem is one for which the solution time increases in polynomial time. When it comes to NP problems, the complexity of the problem is far greater.

This research proposes a method for estimating a nationwide drive time matrix between ZIP code areas in the U.S. The method does not rely on intensive efforts in data preparation or access to advanced computing resources. The core design samples ZIP code pairs with various intensities according to trip lengths and derives the drive times via Google Maps API.

This alternative to Count VI asserts that the conduct and communications between Musk and the defendants established an implied contract, where Altman promised that OpenAI would remain a non-profit and make its findings open for public benefit. Musk fulfilled his obligations by contributing significant funding and recruiting talent. However, in 2023, Altman and OpenAI allegedly breached this contract by failing to publicly disclose research,...